Various studies have examined the
subject of drug abuse among physicians and have shown that, in general, the
rate of illicit drug use is less among doctors than the general public.
The rate of abuse of prescription drugs however is considerably
greater for physicians, up to five times higher than in the general population.
Up to 15 percent of all health care professionals will battle substance abuse
at some point in their careers. Is this due to stress? Overwork? Easy access to
addictive substances?
Historically, physicians have experienced a high rate of drug abuse and drug addiction. With the increased use of medical cocaine in the late 1800s, physicians were thought to constitute 30 percent of all cocaine users. The problem of abuse among physicians was well recognized. 'A man who is his own lawyer, has a fool for a client'. This same line of thought was most pertinent to the medical field where cocaine used by physicians was usually self-prescribed.
In the nineteenth century, there was no formal process by which new drugs were investigated and doctors often simply experimented on themselves. The renowned and well-respected physician William Halsted, along with several of his colleagues, became cocaine abusers while assessing this new drug, cocaine.
Halsted was able to recognize his addiction and 'cured' himself of the cocaine habit by shifting to the use of morphine instead. He continued on, able to handle his morphine addiction more easily than the cocaine addiction, achieving a notable career in American surgery.
But in the field of medicine, there is one speciality that is especially prone to substance abuse and it is abuse of the most powerful, dangerous and addictive substances known.
Cocaine |
Historically, physicians have experienced a high rate of drug abuse and drug addiction. With the increased use of medical cocaine in the late 1800s, physicians were thought to constitute 30 percent of all cocaine users. The problem of abuse among physicians was well recognized. 'A man who is his own lawyer, has a fool for a client'. This same line of thought was most pertinent to the medical field where cocaine used by physicians was usually self-prescribed.
In the nineteenth century, there was no formal process by which new drugs were investigated and doctors often simply experimented on themselves. The renowned and well-respected physician William Halsted, along with several of his colleagues, became cocaine abusers while assessing this new drug, cocaine.
William Stewart Halsted |
Halsted was able to recognize his addiction and 'cured' himself of the cocaine habit by shifting to the use of morphine instead. He continued on, able to handle his morphine addiction more easily than the cocaine addiction, achieving a notable career in American surgery.
But in the field of medicine, there is one speciality that is especially prone to substance abuse and it is abuse of the most powerful, dangerous and addictive substances known.
The speciality field is anesthesia (the
specialists who put you to sleep for surgery) and the substances most commonly
abused are narcotics (morphine and its derivatives). Needless to say,
anesthesia can be a very stressful job. Knowing what type of medication is
needed, how much is needed and during what point in the surgery it should be
administered are all important factors that can determine life, significant
brain injury or even death. No patient is the same. There are no 'recipes' for
drugs except according to weight, age, cardiac condition, kidney condition,
drugs the patient already is taking...The list goes on and on.
Anesthesia is similar to piloting a
large aircraft (but without any auto-pilot or computer to back you up): a
period of boredom (hopefully) while the patient is safely anesthetized (the
aircraft is in flight) with a period of 'terror' at the beginning (take-off),
as the patient is put to sleep and another period of 'terror' at the end
(landing), as the patient is brought out of anesthesia.
But with all these powerful drugs at
hand (barbiturates are also commonly abused by anesthetists) and all the
stress of the job, it is perhaps surprising that more of these specialists
don't become addicts. Although anesthetists make up only 3 percent of all
specialists, this group accounts for 20 to 30 percent of
drug-addicted doctors.
Several organisations recognize the
problem of addiction among physicians and realize that certain groups, such as
anesthetists, are more susceptible to this problem. Despite campaigns as well
as teaching of the risks of addiction early in medical training, the difficulty
with substance abuse among doctors remains a problem.
Anesthetists at the Head of the Operating Table |
In the operating room, anesthetists
usually wear short sleeves. The needle tracks of injection sites would be
difficult to hide but these specialists are not just experts at putting a
patient to sleep. They are also experts at finding and accessing veins
for drug administration - between the toes, on the leg or the inside of the
thigh. Drug addiction is an 'occupational hazard' among this group of
physicians but a hazard that can have catastrophic effects for the patient
under care.
Is an anesthetist on drugs (The 'High'
Doctor) still capable of performing his/her work? That depends on whether the
addict has become tolerant to his 'drug of choice', when he took it, the type
and sub class of drug used...This list goes on and on, too. But the short
answer is 'No'. No physician, dependent on drugs is safe to 'pilot the
airplane'. His response time and ability to make a decision may be unreliable.
His judgement may be impaired.
And even when giving a drug to himself,
does the doctor, at that point, really know what drug he has just taken? Drugs
in the operating room are administered by vein, many do not contain
preservatives, the vast majority have no color. In the bottle and in the
syringe (except for the labelling, if it is done correctly), they all look the
same. They all look like water.
What follows is a true story: He was a
young man (J.R. - not his real identity), a specialist in anesthesia, out of
training no more than 5 years. The patients who met him, loved him and had
great confidence in his skills. The surgeons and nurses knew him well (or so
they believed). J.R.' s behaviour seemed normal. At times, however, he would be
very talkative, at other times, there was only silence behind the curtain of
sterile sheets that separated the surgery from the head of the table where the
patient lay.
At the end of one very long week, J.R.
'disappeared' before his patient was transferred to the recovery room (an
unusual event in the practice of anesthesia) and no body knew where he was.
Just by chance, one of the nursing staff, searching for a mop in a closet,
found J.R, still breathing, slumped in a corner, a needle in his arm.
J.R., medical expert, knowledgeable of
all the risks and possible complications inherent in anesthetic drugs, had
mistaken his substance of choice (fentanyl, a narcotic - see post: A Basketful of Narcotics) with a paralysing agent (pancuronium). Immediately upon injecting
the wrong agent, J.R. realised that he had made a mistake but it was too late.
The paralysis seized his body and he stopped breathing.
J.R. was one of the lucky ones. Nursing
staff and fellow anesthetists came quickly to the scene and he was
resuscitated.
Both medications in this particular
circumstance are the color of water. Both are given intravenously. Each one can
be easily confused with any number of anesthetic agents. And each one alone can
be deadly.
But how can a physician in this position
of authority and responsibility, in the presence of and watched by fellow staff
members, obtain the drugs (narcotics, in the case of J.R.) without his
co-workers knowing? Is there not a system, an accounting of drugs used? Is
there not a way of measuring how much narcotic was used for the patient, when
it was given and how much of the open ampoule that the drug was packaged in was
left over?
The answer is 'Yes'. But, as with most systems, there are
always ways to 'outsmart' it.
No comments:
Post a Comment